<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Warren County Democratic Committee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://warrencodems.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://warrencodems.org</link>
	<description>Front Royal, VA 22630 &#124; VA Congressional District 10</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 02:18:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Democrats in Action:  Accomplishments Year One by steven lee conner</title>
		<link>http://warrencodems.org/democrats-in-action-accomplishments-year-one/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>steven lee conner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 02:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warrencodems.org/wordpress/?p=198#comment-212</guid>
		<description>With understanding of both dualites, then are not both sides &quot;continue to be more concerned with campaigning than they are about making government work effectively?&quot; Sure they are. Both are pulling in opposing directions as if to meet somewhere in the middle--over there. Well, &quot;why not here--as one on the left moves a bit to the right with the right being a bit pushed to the extreme may find like happiness in the mere next-to center: isn&#039;t this what we call moderate politics? And isn&#039;t this better than locking horns until Chirst returns? Will he? Will you? Will they? Will we? 

Both should respect the current president and enjoin him as a centrist, as I am.

Although said, &quot;legislation that revamped the ailing US economy and enacted new consumer protections against healthcare insurance and credit card companies as well as educational and financial reform,&quot; being revamped does not presuppose that anything is working, correct? One can revamp a firms mission statement and then throw it in the grayish thin metal cabinet as most do, but unless one hires a M1 or a &quot;manager,&quot; then status quo, the p-extended aggregate remain &quot;untouched,&quot; unconditioned, and illiterate of &quot;our&quot; agenda.  With healh, isn&#039;t food health first proper before the extrinsic method is apllied, we must endore and induce legislation for intrinsic finalities that make people move, not sit and get fat. 

The credit card and its rating mechanisms were falsely and artificially raised from 800 points to 900 points, which artificially and falsely lowered everyone &quot;good&quot; to &quot;average&quot; by 100 points: &quot;Who paid for that, Biden?&quot; I wrote to the senator on the west coast when this initially happened; he never responded just like when I challenged the CEO of Geico for falsely billing me, he to gave me the cold shoulder, yet all car insurance firms continue to raise their prices when in fact the new teen&#039;s rite of passage is not the new car, so &quot;What gives with that?&quot; Or is &quot;that&quot; the reason why isurance firms are gouging Americans, again and again with myopic conditonals riding on every CEO&#039;s back for a slight profit to maintian their own control on this very distabilizing stratification uneasiness. Feel okay yet?

My town of Staunton is laying of teachers, so education is working, right?

Kmart will take Land&#039;s End with it, and how many times has this happened? But where will they store their crappy inventory--in shipping containers that will soon find their home in the Oceanic? &quot;Have plastic will float.&quot;

We have ex employees from AIG that were IT workers pushing paper now at Salley Mae, who have outdated telephony asking for data that will not be used in the new ERP, but since the outsourced contractors (, which seem to be a huge problem within government cost accouting and liability issues) are not skilled enough to cram their DB tables into a 3NF, students still in college are getting statements that are not due until 2013!

As a moderate, we must ask: &quot;Don&#039;t fight back, but join us in fighting the system.&quot; Is it you--too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With understanding of both dualites, then are not both sides &#8220;continue to be more concerned with campaigning than they are about making government work effectively?&#8221; Sure they are. Both are pulling in opposing directions as if to meet somewhere in the middle&#8211;over there. Well, &#8220;why not here&#8211;as one on the left moves a bit to the right with the right being a bit pushed to the extreme may find like happiness in the mere next-to center: isn&#8217;t this what we call moderate politics? And isn&#8217;t this better than locking horns until Chirst returns? Will he? Will you? Will they? Will we? </p>
<p>Both should respect the current president and enjoin him as a centrist, as I am.</p>
<p>Although said, &#8220;legislation that revamped the ailing US economy and enacted new consumer protections against healthcare insurance and credit card companies as well as educational and financial reform,&#8221; being revamped does not presuppose that anything is working, correct? One can revamp a firms mission statement and then throw it in the grayish thin metal cabinet as most do, but unless one hires a M1 or a &#8220;manager,&#8221; then status quo, the p-extended aggregate remain &#8220;untouched,&#8221; unconditioned, and illiterate of &#8220;our&#8221; agenda.  With healh, isn&#8217;t food health first proper before the extrinsic method is apllied, we must endore and induce legislation for intrinsic finalities that make people move, not sit and get fat. </p>
<p>The credit card and its rating mechanisms were falsely and artificially raised from 800 points to 900 points, which artificially and falsely lowered everyone &#8220;good&#8221; to &#8220;average&#8221; by 100 points: &#8220;Who paid for that, Biden?&#8221; I wrote to the senator on the west coast when this initially happened; he never responded just like when I challenged the CEO of Geico for falsely billing me, he to gave me the cold shoulder, yet all car insurance firms continue to raise their prices when in fact the new teen&#8217;s rite of passage is not the new car, so &#8220;What gives with that?&#8221; Or is &#8220;that&#8221; the reason why isurance firms are gouging Americans, again and again with myopic conditonals riding on every CEO&#8217;s back for a slight profit to maintian their own control on this very distabilizing stratification uneasiness. Feel okay yet?</p>
<p>My town of Staunton is laying of teachers, so education is working, right?</p>
<p>Kmart will take Land&#8217;s End with it, and how many times has this happened? But where will they store their crappy inventory&#8211;in shipping containers that will soon find their home in the Oceanic? &#8220;Have plastic will float.&#8221;</p>
<p>We have ex employees from AIG that were IT workers pushing paper now at Salley Mae, who have outdated telephony asking for data that will not be used in the new ERP, but since the outsourced contractors (, which seem to be a huge problem within government cost accouting and liability issues) are not skilled enough to cram their DB tables into a 3NF, students still in college are getting statements that are not due until 2013!</p>
<p>As a moderate, we must ask: &#8220;Don&#8217;t fight back, but join us in fighting the system.&#8221; Is it you&#8211;too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Letter To The Editor &#8211; NV Daily.com by Kelli Hart</title>
		<link>http://warrencodems.org/letter-to-the-editor-nv-daily-com/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelli Hart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warrencodems.org/wordpress/?p=227#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Perfect letter Tina. And the struggle continues so we all need to keep reminding Wolf about how important this issue is to us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perfect letter Tina. And the struggle continues so we all need to keep reminding Wolf about how important this issue is to us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are We Headed in the Right Direction? by Waller Wilson</title>
		<link>http://warrencodems.org/headed-in-right-direction/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Waller Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 13:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warrencodems.org/?p=285#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Your point about the poor and middle class being asked to make all the sacrifices is well taken.  

Regarding our huge budget deficits and the need to correct this situation, Tom Coburn (Republican Senator from Oklahoma) had an interesting observation in his op ed piece in the Washington Post on Tuesday.  He said “Of my Republican friends I would ask: What good is a Republican Party without a republic?  And of my Democratic friends “What good is your commitment to the poor without an economy to sustain your commitments?”

I believe it is fair to infer from that statement what we have understood for a long time and that is that the Republicans could care less about the poor.  Now all we need to do is to make sure that the poor of which there are many understand this and vote.

Regarding Coburn’s piece, I would like to add that it is full of fear mongering about the budget situation which I think we all recognize needs to be resolved.  In this regard he says: “There is no question that the American people are deeply concerned about spending and deficits.”  But there is not one word about increasing taxes to pay for what we want.  He talks about putting everything on the table, but can’t bring himself to say “tax increase.”  I presume that by saying “every thing on the table” he means that we must put all of the spending cuts on the table.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your point about the poor and middle class being asked to make all the sacrifices is well taken.  </p>
<p>Regarding our huge budget deficits and the need to correct this situation, Tom Coburn (Republican Senator from Oklahoma) had an interesting observation in his op ed piece in the Washington Post on Tuesday.  He said “Of my Republican friends I would ask: What good is a Republican Party without a republic?  And of my Democratic friends “What good is your commitment to the poor without an economy to sustain your commitments?”</p>
<p>I believe it is fair to infer from that statement what we have understood for a long time and that is that the Republicans could care less about the poor.  Now all we need to do is to make sure that the poor of which there are many understand this and vote.</p>
<p>Regarding Coburn’s piece, I would like to add that it is full of fear mongering about the budget situation which I think we all recognize needs to be resolved.  In this regard he says: “There is no question that the American people are deeply concerned about spending and deficits.”  But there is not one word about increasing taxes to pay for what we want.  He talks about putting everything on the table, but can’t bring himself to say “tax increase.”  I presume that by saying “every thing on the table” he means that we must put all of the spending cuts on the table.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are We Headed in the Right Direction? by B Stevens</title>
		<link>http://warrencodems.org/headed-in-right-direction/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>B Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 18:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warrencodems.org/?p=285#comment-3</guid>
		<description>As a surveyor I can relate to your story about finding monuments in the woods. Often we spend hours looking for property corners that are not there and quite as often we find a hidden corner by changing our viewpoint and looking from a different direction. I agree that the purpose of Congress is to find compromise among the parties in order to pass needed legislation, not for each party to stand by their principles in their own corner while doing nothing for the American people. You hit the nail on the head in talking about needing tax increases. Most often pundits, media, and Americans themselves talk about only one side of the equation or only one &quot;solution&quot; to the problem. This pertains to energy as well where people constantly talk about needing more supply of energy while never addressing the demand side of the equation. Maybe we should use less energy rather than demand an unlimited supply to feed our desires. Anyway, regarding the budget, people talk about sharing the sacrifice, but the poor and middle class are asked to sacrifice, while the rich and corporations are not asked to. In fact, larger tax cuts are given to corporations and we are asked to pay for it by penalizing the middle class or Medicaid recipients. Bravo to you for your suggestion that conservatives must give up their unrealistic stance on &quot;no tax increases.&quot; After all, they are saying they will not vote reasonably on the budget or debt ceiling unless the other side gives in on something. The democratic process which we are fortunate to have includes a government with checks and balances and multiple political parties. This is to ensure that all are represented and that resulting legislation is balanced between many viewpoints. The purpose of our legislative process is to compromise and produce legislation that serves the American people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a surveyor I can relate to your story about finding monuments in the woods. Often we spend hours looking for property corners that are not there and quite as often we find a hidden corner by changing our viewpoint and looking from a different direction. I agree that the purpose of Congress is to find compromise among the parties in order to pass needed legislation, not for each party to stand by their principles in their own corner while doing nothing for the American people. You hit the nail on the head in talking about needing tax increases. Most often pundits, media, and Americans themselves talk about only one side of the equation or only one &#8220;solution&#8221; to the problem. This pertains to energy as well where people constantly talk about needing more supply of energy while never addressing the demand side of the equation. Maybe we should use less energy rather than demand an unlimited supply to feed our desires. Anyway, regarding the budget, people talk about sharing the sacrifice, but the poor and middle class are asked to sacrifice, while the rich and corporations are not asked to. In fact, larger tax cuts are given to corporations and we are asked to pay for it by penalizing the middle class or Medicaid recipients. Bravo to you for your suggestion that conservatives must give up their unrealistic stance on &#8220;no tax increases.&#8221; After all, they are saying they will not vote reasonably on the budget or debt ceiling unless the other side gives in on something. The democratic process which we are fortunate to have includes a government with checks and balances and multiple political parties. This is to ensure that all are represented and that resulting legislation is balanced between many viewpoints. The purpose of our legislative process is to compromise and produce legislation that serves the American people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

